The printed word is dying . . . a slow and lingering death
perhaps, but dying nevertheless.
This pains me. I worked for my college newspaper, then a
local daily paper. After selling out, as my newspaper friends teased, I spent
years in financial marketing, creating, developing and managing everything from
client and broker newsletters, sales pieces, marketing packages and new-issue
investment offerings. All printed. Some expensive and glossy and some one- or
two-color weekly quickies.
I loved the fast pace of a daily newspaper, at least one or
two news articles a day when I was a reporter and a few feature pieces every
week. There was no better writing and reporting place in the world. And later
there was no better editing place in the world. The sheer speed and volume of
work was exhilarating. At an interview at Time
magazine the very bright guy who interviewed me said I should go to grad school
before landing full-time at some to-be-decided publication. He was probably
right, but I wanted to get my hands in the ink somewhere . . . and newly
married, the local paper, the Greenwich
Time, was the place. I’d worked
there for a summer as an intern, so I figured it was the place to start.
When I started, the paper was printed a few short steps from
where the editorial room was, reporters and editors rushing to make deadline.
It was an afternoon paper then, and watching that day’s paper roll off the
press was a regular routine. The printing operation was moved up to our sister
paper, the Stamford Advocate, after
they were purchased Times-Mirror, and we became a morning paper.
Not to date myself too much, but back then the only way to
get the news was to read a daily paper. Now just about everyone has at least
one computer, a smart phone or some other device on which they can get the
latest headlines in seconds.
Even in the beginning, the decline was fast, smaller papers
were soaked up by bigger ones, newspaper costs kept rising and circulations
started falling, news was more available online, and online advertising cut
into newspaper advertising. The classified ad market changed completely with
the creation of outlets like Craigslist, and since classifieds provided a huge
revenue stream for papers, they couldn’t generate growing profits.
Soon bigger papers were merged with other bigger papers, but
circulation continued to fall and papers started to fail. Even papers like The New York Times (which I’ll argue
remains the country’s best paper), were pulled into the death spiral. The
digital age was fully upon us. And newspaper, magazine and book owners and
publishers, not to mention writers, editors and other staff, are scrambling to
catch up. Often not very successfully.
The vaulted New York
Times continues to struggle, floundering to work its online product with its
printed product. Deep staff cuts and changes at the top of the Times and other papers makes one wonder
whether the depth and breadth of news coverage is a thing of the past. Even the
better non-newspaper online news sources cover just bigger stories and often
have daily gaps in features.
Of course, creating online content is cheaper than heating
and maintaining the high-cost, centrally located buildings and printing
facilities many newspapers have had for years. And since there’s no printing
needed, capital costs are slashed.
So most papers today have an online presence, and many offer
their full editorial content online. Often that content is free to readers.
What remains to be seen is whether or not readers will pay for that content
(and if so, how much?).
And while printed marketing materials will probably always
be produced (salesmen like to hand things to potential customers), online
marketing is a must for nearly every business.
The book business is suffering the same fate. E-readers are
everywhere and Amazon’s new Kindle Fire has already hooked customers even
deeper into the Amazon pipeline. While printed books continue to sell, the
writing, as it were, is on the wall, though some of us remain attached to the
feel and hominess of printed books, the simple fact is that for many people the
Kindle, and other e-readers are convenient. Going on a trip? Download a few
books and you don’t have to figure out how to fit them into your luggage.
Notepads, computers and even smart phones are packed with books, magazines and
newspapers.
And though sharing is limited and donating them to a good
cause can’t be done, millions of books are available as e-books (and some as
just e-books). I don’t really understand the price structure since many e-books
are only a couple of dollars cheaper than the printed version, it seems to me
that pricing as well as improved e-reader and better file sharing will continue
to grow that end of the business at the expense of hard copies. All your
entertainment in one easy device.
I loved the noise, speed and smell and of the printing
process . . . not to mention the thrill of seeing a finished newspaper coming
off the press. Soon that whole process will go the way of the vinyl record and
turntable. I enjoy reading news stories and features on my computer, but books
and magazines still warm me. . . and a generation from now, newspapers and
newspaper stands will be things that kids learn about in history class.
No comments:
Post a Comment