Sunday, June 15, 2014

A Couple of Fishing Memories Happy Father's Day, Dad

My Dad’s not a fisherman, but two of my favorite memories are fishing with him. He was one of the busiest business guys in the world, but Dad always made time for us.

He’d come home from work on Friday night, that huge briefcase of his filled with papers, and we’d head to Vermont for a weekend of skiing. Mom, who seemed to be the busiest Mom in the world, was always there to pick us up, drive us to friends’ houses, make us do our homework and I’m guessing double-checked to make sure I was always wearing matching socks, and always managed to have a huge cooler of food ready for the trip to Vermont. (She was also really good at reminding Dad of people’s names.) Car packed and kids in pajamas, when Dad got home with that heavy briefcase filled with papers, we’d hustle into the car and head off.

Now that was a time when kids managed to survive sleeping in the back seat and on the floor of the Country Squire as we made our way north. I remember getting out of the car and the cold air blasting me, the snow crunching under foot. Mom didn’t learn to ski until she married Dad, and one day as she was learning he found her at the top of the Lord’s Prayer ski run at Bromley after her ski instructor had to take the rest of the class down. Guess it worked out OK, though, they’ve been married 64 years. Mom skied for 50-plus years, all over the world. Dad skied for a bit longer, two artificial knees and all. Somewhere I have an old photo of him holding me between his skis as we took the rope tow up at Catamount. He had two real knees back then. That was a long time ago.

I don’t remember when or where I learned to fish, but I do remember fishing with my grandfather, Papa Brophy, at a summer place they had at Merriwold in the Catskills, a small, cabin-like house on a small, no motorboats lake. I remember him taking me out in the wooden row boat and “jitterbugging” for bass with a long bamboo pole that had three-feet of line tied to the end of it holding a big old Jitterbug plug. He’d swipe that long pole back and forth, the hefty plug making all kinds of a racket on the water around the lilly pads, and darn if a big old bass or pickerel wouldn’t hit that thing. I’m not sure whether the fish thought it was some kind of a food-critter like a mouse making that racket, or just was pissed at all the water noise. I should also shamefully admit that my grandmother, Nana, rowed that big heavy row boat around the small lake while a friend and I trolled, sitting on the seat together, watching our lines, while Nana rowed and chatted with us about everything in the world. I loved it there, and my friends loved it, too.

Now Papa was part of one of those fishing memories of mine, a trip to Canada, hosted by a business guy Dad knew who owned a fishing camp at the edge of a lake. As a young guy, this place was just amazing. I remember a well-appointed log cabin, not fancy, but sitting right at the edge of a lake with a long dock just a short walk out the back door, two large picture windows on either side of that door letting in tons of light and offering a continual lake seduction to a young kid who figured the biggest trout in the world were in there somewhere. Electricity came via a generator that was shut off at night, and a large ice house was stacked floor to ceiling with big blocks of saw-dust-covered ice cut from the lake the winter before.

So there I was in Canada with Dad and Papa . . . fishing. Remember that Dad isn’t a fisherman. But there we were, out on a lake. Dad and his Dad in one boat, and me and the business guy in another. The business guy recommended using lures with red and white on them, like a Daredevil. So we’re casting and catching a fish here and there when the business guy leans over, opens his tackle box and unwraps a paper towel to reveal several pieces of steak from the previous night’s dinner. I have to say Dad and Papa couldn’t figure out why were catching more fish than they were. (We did confess later.) Now the final piece of the Canadian tale was the embarrassing fact that at the end of the day, we were about to pose for a photo, a string of trout laid in the open trunk of the big black Chrysler sedan as we took off a few extra articles of clothing and got ready to pose . . . and Steve closes the trunk. Fish and keys inside. The car had a push-button automatic transmission, which I had never seen before. Funny what we remember.

When I was a bit older, Dad took me to an Orvis/Winchester clinic at Stratton Mountain in Vermont, a place where Mom and Dad found the rundown old farmhouse they renovated and turned into a second home that entertained family and friends for decades.

At the clinic, we learned how to cast a fly rod, taught by Lee Wulff and his wife, Joan. No, really . . . Lee and Joan Wulff. (For the rest of my life, the fly I reach for first is some type of Wulff fly, often a Royal Wulff, since it has a touch of that red and white the Canadian business guy said trout liked.) We shot Winchester rifles, and cast hookless flies at the base of the mountain, a wide trail serving as a “run” for a fake deer on a cable motored across the opening so we could take a Polaroid photo of it with a camera mounted on a gun. I was glad we didn’t actually kill anything.

The clinic the next day was moved to the Battenkill River, and we took what we learned into the cool running water of the iconic trout stream, casting to resting fish near the bank, downstream from logs or rocks, or tucked into a piece of calm water in a riffle.

Me and Dad.

He isn’t a fisherman, but he took me fishing.

Happy Father’s Day, Dad

Tuesday, June 10, 2014

The Problem with Moralists Is They Always Think They're Right . . . Everyone Else be Damned



So why fight these fights if the wave of change is clear?

It seems to me, we sometimes hold on to what we think believe dear. And sometimes we don’t see a bigger picture. To these politicians, being anti-gay is right. Homosexuality is wrong, and therefore needs to be punished and squashed. So they want to punish those who are gay.

As their 2012 platform read, "We affirm that the practice of homosexuality tears at the fabric of society and contributes to the breakdown of the family unit. Homosexual behavior is contrary to the fundamental, unchanging truths that have been ordained by God, recognized by our country's founders, and shared by the majority of Texans."

The current document, adopted in 2012, condemns equality for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender individuals. There are multiple sections dealing with the issue, including language that reads: According to a draft of the new platform, obtained by the San Antonio Express-News/Houston Chronicle, that language is gone.

And while that language is gone, there’s still this, “Homosexuality must not be presented as an acceptable alternative lifestyle, in public policy, nor should family be redefined to include homosexual couples. We believe there should be no granting of special legal entitlements or creation of special status for homosexual behavior, regardless of state of origin. Additionally, we oppose any criminal or civil penalties against those who oppose homosexuality out of faith, conviction, or belief in traditional values. We recognize the legitimacy and value of counseling which offers reparative therapy and treatment to patients who are seeking escape from the homosexual lifestyle. No laws or executive orders shall be imposed to limit or restrict access to this type of therapy.”

The vast majority of state Republican platforms still contain anti-gay language. According to a count by The Huffington Post, only seven states (and Washington DC) have no mention of opposition to same-sex marriage or other rights for LGBT individuals in their party platforms.

While there are many more issues in the world (and Texas), than gay rights, I continue to be amazed at the party’s political blindness. Is this not seen as pointed discriminatory thought? Do these people not see that they are purposely telling fellow humans that they do not have the same rights as straight people? Let’s be clear, too, that this carries beyond marriage equality . . . it carries into same-sex partner benefits, housing, job discrimination and even so-called (falsely) “religious freedom” acts that enable business owners to refuse to serve gays.

How are those things different than segregation laws?

How is “religious freedom” and different than keeping black people out of stores and restaurants in days past? Or throwing women out of work because they’re women? And on and on.

It isn’t . . . and it’s shameful. The cover is religion . . . That’s how people justify bad behavior, and have forever. Can’t we see what’s right and moral without the cloud of religion inserted into our politics? Of course, should anyone criticize that they are tagged “anti-religion” and are “waging a war” on religion.

Nope . . . I’m not anti-religion at all. Believe whatever you like . . . I’m just anti-hate and discrimination. I think everyone should have the same rights as everyone else . . . and no group of people should be cut out of that. Simple.

 I wonder if we denied Texans access to their partners’ hospital rooms, threw them out of restaurants or fired them for being Texans if they’d see the picture a bit differently. Maybe not . . . That’s the problem with moralists . . . They think they are always right.

Friday, June 6, 2014

Why Can't Republicans See the Error of Their Ways on Gay Rights?


Republicans argue that they aren’t waging a policy war on women, and though state and regional legislative votes and proposed Congressional legislation speak otherwise, there is no question the party is waging a hateful and vicious war on gays.

Despite an obvious shift in voter opinions on gay marriage, Republicans continue to add to their already extreme anti-gay positions, doubling-down wherever they can, however they can.

The latest example is Texas, where the Republican draft platform openly endorses and encourages “gay conversion therapy,” a controversial, medically rejected therapy that they say can cause “significant physical and psychological harm.” Two states, California and New Jersey have banned the practice on minors.

In Pew Research polling in 2001, Americans opposed same-sex marriage by a 57% to 35% margin.
Since then, support for same-sex marriage has steadily grown. Today, a majority of Americans (54%) support same-sex marriage, compared with 39% who oppose it. Some 68 percent of those born after 1980 support gay marriage, up from 44 percent in 2004.

Among people who are religiously unaffiliated, a solid majority have supported same-sex marriage since 2001.

Among Catholics and white mainline Protestants, roughly six-in-ten now express support for same-sex marriage. Support for same-sex marriage also has grown among black Protestants (to 44 percent from 19 percent in 2004). Support among white evangelical Protestants remains lower than among other groups (up from 11 percent in 2004 to 23 percent now). (Pew)

Various detailed polls and studies on same-sex marriage that were conducted in several countries show that support for same-sex marriage generally increases with higher levels of education, and that younger people are more likely to support legalization than older generations. (Wiki) Something reflected in the Pew polling.

The trend is clear and irrefutable, but Republicans are stuck in their anti-gay rut. I’m not sure why they can’t step away from it. I suppose it’s an issue that fires up the local and regional base, but with state after state having anti-gay marriage bans overturned, what’s the upside for the GOP?

Texas (They do have good barbeque anyway . . . and a bunch of other good stuff, thank goodness . . .) is living in a political Stone Age. The GOP platform also contains sections endorsing the federal Defense of Marriage Act, which defines marriage as being between one man and one woman. The U.S. Supreme Court struck down a major portion of that law last year, paving the way for judges around the country to declare marriage equality legal. There are now 19 states plus the District of Columbia where same-sex marriage is allowed.

So why is the Texas GOP fighting these battles?